On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Gao,Yan <y...@novell.com> wrote: > On 06/01/11 18:51, Yuusuke IIDA wrote: >> Hi, Yan >> >> An answer becomes slow, and really I'm sorry. >> >> (2011/05/13 15:06), Gao,Yan wrote: >>> I understand that you think the improvement for the non-default >>> placement strategy makes sense to the "default" too. Though the >>> "default" is somewhat intended not to be affected by any "placement >>> strategy" so that the behaviors of existing pengine test cases and >>> users' deployments remain unchanged. >> I think that a function dispersed with the number of the start of the >> resource has a problem at the time of "default" setting. >> >> This problem is the Pacemaker-1.0 series, but does the same movement. >> If it could be settled by this correction, I thought a correction to be >> applicable in Pacemaker-1.0. >> >> Should not this problem be revised? > This would affect dozens of existing regression tests, although most of > the changes are just the scores of clone instances, which are due to > different resource allocating orders. Given 1.0 is in such a maintenance > state, I'm not sure we should do that for 1.0. > > Andrew, what do you think about it? Perhaps we should fix the > resource-number-balancing for "default" strategy in 1.1 at least?
I think for 1.1 we can do something, I'd just like to understand the the implications of the patch. It would help if there was a testcase that illustrated the negative behaviour. Is it necessary that both parts of the old if-block are always run? > >> >>> >>> For "utilization" strategy, load-balancing is still done based on the >>> number of resources allocated to a node. That might be a choice. >>> >> When I do not set capacity by "utilization" setting in Pacemaker-1.1 , >> expected movement is possible! >> >> Best Regards, >> Yuusuke IIDA >> > > Regards, > Yan > -- > Gao,Yan <y...@novell.com> > Software Engineer > China Server Team, SUSE. > _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
