Hi Yuusuke, On 05/12/11 19:56, Yuusuke IIDA wrote: > Hi Yan, > > I tested the correction. > > The problem that I reported was improved by the correction that you > performed. Great, thanks for doing that!
> > When I tested it, I found a different problem. > > When I set "placement-strategy=default", it is a problem that a function > to disperse does not commit placement by the number of the start resource. > > When this problem applies the patch which I affixed it to, it is settled. > > Is the correction with this patch right? I understand that you think the improvement for the non-default placement strategy makes sense to the "default" too. Though the "default" is somewhat intended not to be affected by any "placement strategy" so that the behaviors of existing pengine test cases and users' deployments remain unchanged. For "utilization" strategy, load-balancing is still done based on the number of resources allocated to a node. That might be a choice. Regards, Yan -- Gao,Yan <y...@novell.com> Software Engineer China Server Team, SUSE. <javascript:void(0);> _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
