01.04.2011 11:10, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov <bub...@hoster-ok.com> > wrote: >> 01.04.2011 10:20, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >>> The clone instance numbers for anonymous clones are an implementation >>> detail and nothing should be inferred from them. >>> Did anything actually get moved or just the numbers changed? >>> >> >> Main inconvenience is that all dependent resources are forcibly restarted. > > Ok, then thats a bug. Is there a hb_report somewhere for this scenario?
Sent privately (just a note for ML). _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
