On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov <bub...@hoster-ok.com> wrote: > 01.04.2011 10:20, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> The clone instance numbers for anonymous clones are an implementation >> detail and nothing should be inferred from them. >> Did anything actually get moved or just the numbers changed? >> > > Main inconvenience is that all dependent resources are forcibly restarted.
Ok, then thats a bug. Is there a hb_report somewhere for this scenario? _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
