Hi Andrew, Thank you for comment.
> > If you need detailed information, give me communication. > > Should be enough in the bug, i'll follow up there All right. Thanks! Hideo Yamauchi. --- On Tue, 2011/2/15, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 3:01 PM, <renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp> wrote: > > Hi Andrew, > > > > Thank you for comment. > > > >> Perhaps I misunderstood - does the node fail _while_ we're running > >> post_notify_start_0? > >> Is that the ordering you're talking about? > > > > Yes. > > I think that stonith do not have to wait for post_notify_start_0 of the > > inoperative node. > > > >> If so, then the crmd is already supposed to be smart enough not to bother > >> waiting for those actions - perhaps the logic got broken at some point. > > > > If you need detailed information, give me communication. > > Should be enough in the bug, i'll follow up there > _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
