> well, I was using 1.1.3 for a while, but I reverted to 1.0 line for stability > reasons. > furthermore, from what andrew said, 1.1.4 needs newer glib2 which complicates > things for us conservative people even more :) > but if the bug is really fixed in 1.1.4, it could be possible to backport the > patch. > i'll have a look to mercurial, and report. Hmm, I guess it could be this patch: 10339:3d2a39c03666 but it doesn't apply cleanly and fixing it will certainly require somewhat deeper knowledge of pacemaker internals... Andrew, do You think fix could get into 1.0 branch as well? If it's the one I need at all? n.
-- ------------------------------------- Ing. Nikola CIPRICH LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o. 28. rijna 168, 709 01 Ostrava tel.: +420 596 603 142 fax: +420 596 621 273 mobil: +420 777 093 799 www.linuxbox.cz mobil servis: +420 737 238 656 email servis: ser...@linuxbox.cz ------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
