... > well, I was using 1.1.3 for a while, but I reverted to 1.0 line for stability > reasons. > furthermore, from what andrew said, 1.1.4 needs newer glib2 which complicates > things for us conservative people even more :)
I'd build it as a parallel package, f.e. glib224, with includes in /usr/include/glib-2.24 and .so symlinks in /usr/lib/glib-2.24. Thus you'll have everything in directories (separate from a "main" glib2 package) which you should manually supply to pacemaker during build, and all other packages are unaffected because they are linked with older glib which is installed in parallel. Of course you may hit some problems which solely depend on how much glib headers are relocatable. ... > yup, I have to be a bit conservative here.. hopefully EL6 will be out soon :) And you use 2.6.35 on EL5. I wouldn't say this is too conservative. ;) _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
