Fixed: http://hg.linux-ha.org/agents/rev/36323bc53465
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Lars Ellenberg > <lars.ellenb...@linbit.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 03:05:32PM +0200, Christoph Mitasch wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I just read the following thread: >>> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/users/56429?do=post_view_threaded#56429 >>> >>> What does this mean for the moment? >>> Is the IPaddr2 resource not working correctly at the moment on CentOS 5? >>> >>> What is the way to go at the moment? >> >> Dunno. >> but one could replace the call to /usr/lib/heartbeat/send_arp >> in IPaddr2 with calls to /usr/bin/arping, >> where arping come from the package called (in debian) iputils-arping. >> >> heartbeat send_arp: >> send_arp -i $interval_ms -r $repeat_count -p $some_pid_file $DEVICE $IP >> ${MAC:-auto} not_used not_used >> >> iputils-arping: >> ( >> arping -U -b -c $repeat_count -w $repeat_count -I $DEVICE -s $IP $IP & >> arping -A -b -c $repeat_count -w $repeat_count -I $DEVICE -s $IP $IP & > > Is this second one (with -A) really necessary? > My arping reading of the code indicates it shouldn't be. > >> wait >> ) >> >> should be almost functionally equivalent... > > It should be more than that :-) > send_arp.linux.c is the arping code with a few changes to support the > interface exposed by the old send_arp binary. > _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
