> On Nov 25, 2018, at 11:57 PM, Gert Doering <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>> On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 09:16:23PM -0800, Joe Touch wrote:
>> I.e., most of the analysis in this document is flat out incorrect in 
>> assuming that merely because a packet could cause a router to do work that 
>> it is a security risk to handle that packet as intended.
> 
> And then IETF wonders why operators do not feel like time spent on
> providing their input to IETF WGs is well-spent.
> 
> What else can it be, on a real-world device, in today's Internet?

The failure of a device to run as advertised or the failure of an operation to 
select the an appropriate device.

Operators that want to conserve resources without cause are welcome to run 
their routers inside glass boxes in museums.  Routers do work. Packets cause 
that work. That work is not an attack unless it is *disproportionate*. That is 
not shown for nearly any of the cases in this document.

Joe


_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec

Reply via email to