On 2/8/15 5:30 PM, Ted Lemon wrote: > On Feb 8, 2015, at 6:21 PM, C. M. Heard <[email protected]> wrote: >> Would your objections be addressed if Section 3 of the draft were >> replaced by something along the lines of the following? > > No. This is not a draft about filtering extension headers. It is a draft > about filtering DHCP. The two are unrelated, and should not be discussed as > if they were related. > This is the peril of getting a little far afield. I think we can solve the dhcpv6 problem discussion with a more narrowly scoped attack on the text.
>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
