On Feb 9, 2015, at 7:27 PM, Fernando Gont <[email protected]> wrote: > Your code also assumes that RFC6564 will the deployed, when > hepefuly/chances_are_that it won't. -- Because deploying RFC6564 would > essentially say "bye bye" to any new transport protocols. I keep > repeating it, and you keep ignoring it.
I keep ignoring it because you keep asserting it without explaining why you believe it to be true. > The question is: Are we in agreement that deploying RFC6564 would > prevent us developing any new transport protocols? And, if so, is that > what you want? No, we are not in agreement about this. _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
