TY, looks good to me. Deb Cooley
On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 1:17 AM <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Deb, > > On behalf of the authors, thank you very much for your detailed review and > comments. > > We addressed your feedback together with Tim's, Mike's, Med's, Deb's, > Éric's, Gunter's, Greg's and Gorry's as following > > https://author-tools.ietf.org/diff?doc_1=draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-20&url_2=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/network-analytics/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry/refs/heads/main/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-21.txt > > I hope this addresses your comments. Looking forward to your review. > > Best wishes > Thomas > > -----Original Message----- > From: Deb Cooley via Datatracker <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, August 1, 2025 8:20 PM > To: The IESG <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: [OPSAWG]Deb Cooley's No Objection on > draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-20: (with COMMENT) > > Deb Cooley has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-20: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thanks to Linda Dunbar for their secdir review. > > Section 7, para 4: While RFC 7011 does indeed recommend TLS/DTLS to > protect > sensitive or privacy information, it pre-dates TLS 1.3 and DTLS 1.3. > Consider > adding a note to use BCP195, perhaps this: 'Implementations SHOULD also > refer > to [BCP195] for additional details.' > > > >
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
