On Aug 31, 2025, at 10:11 AM, Michael Tuexen <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 30. Aug 2025, at 23:35, Guy Harris <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Checking nits according to https://www.ietf.org/id-info/1id-guidelines.txt: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> == There are 2 instances of lines with non-ascii characters in the document. >> >> Both are from ü from "Tüxen, M.", as per the above. > Hi Guy, > > please just ignore them... I always have this. I changed using Tuexen on Tüxen > by advice from the RFC editor a long time ago. If the RFC editor told you to use Tüxen, that sounds like official policy. (RFC 7997 is "Informative", but it still approves of UTF-8.) Given that, I don't know what version of idnits allows them (and, presumably, checks to make sure octets with the high bit set are *only* used in valid UTF-8 sequences); if that's idnits 2 rather than the not-yet-released idnits 3, perhaps idnits 2 should be used. In any case, I'll ignore it. Should I change all acknowledgments of "Michael Tuexen" t be "Michael Tüxen"? _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
