Gunter Van de Velde has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit-19: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- # Gunter Van de Velde, RTG AD, comments for draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit-19 # the referenced line numbers are derived from the idnits tool: https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/idnits?url=https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit-19.txt # This is a well written document. I have a non-blocking editorial observation: The text uses lower and upper case AC vs ac inside the model (in descriptions). For consistency maybe align the representation to either all upper case or all lower case: 4854 "description": "a first ac with a same peer node", versus 3632 bandwidth of the AC or download bandwidth from the Note that the uppercase AC seems to be the most dominant within the document. G/ _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
