We wanted to get this WG’s take on it first, but, yes, we did discuss collaborating with dmm.
Joe From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanand...@gmail.com> Date: Sunday, December 22, 2024 at 06:57 To: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jcla...@cisco.com> Cc: opsawg@ietf.org <opsawg@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [OPSAWG]REVIEW: Liaison statement to 3GPP for GTP-U IPFIX work Hi Joe, I do agree that it makes sense to keep this work in OPSAWG. But since you mention it, I am sure this liaison statement is being shared with the DMM WG to get their input on whether they would like any addition to the statement. Thanks. Mahesh Jethanandani mjethanand...@gmail.com On Dec 20, 2024, at 2:56 PM, Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jclarke=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: Before sending this on to the 3GPP liaison, Benoît and I would like to get feedback from opsawg on this LS. For now, we’re focusing this on the work happening in opsawg (though we are aware of other dmm work). If there is additional proposed text WG members feel strongly can be added to tie that work together (maybe with the collaboration of dmm chairs), we would be open to it. The intent of this LS is to draw broader review to this work. Joe <The IETF Operations and Management Area Working Group.docx> _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
