Hi Joe, I do agree that it makes sense to keep this work in OPSAWG. But since you mention it, I am sure this liaison statement is being shared with the DMM WG to get their input on whether they would like any addition to the statement.
Thanks. Mahesh Jethanandani mjethanand...@gmail.com > On Dec 20, 2024, at 2:56 PM, Joe Clarke (jclarke) > <jclarke=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > > Before sending this on to the 3GPP liaison, Benoît and I would like to get > feedback from opsawg on this LS. For now, we’re focusing this on the work > happening in opsawg (though we are aware of other dmm work). If there is > additional proposed text WG members feel strongly can be added to tie that > work together (maybe with the collaboration of dmm chairs), we would be open > to it. > > The intent of this LS is to draw broader review to this work. > > Joe > > > <The IETF Operations and Management Area Working Group.docx> > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
