Hi We pushed for IANA registration because we had an implementation, and that we wanted an RFC for the use cases description, for the RFP, and for the 3GPP references.
Thanks --Sriram From: Aitken, Paul <paitken=40ciena....@dmarc.ietf.org> Date: Wednesday, 18 December 2024 at 8:08 PM To: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com <mohamed.boucad...@orange.com>, Benoit Claise <benoit.cla...@huawei.com>, Sriram Gopalakrishnan (sriragop) <srira...@cisco.com>, opsawg@ietf.org <opsawg@ietf.org> Cc: ops-ads <ops-...@ietf.org>, ie-doct...@ietf.org <ie-doct...@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [OPSAWG]Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-gtpu-02.txt Med, IEs defined in a WG document should not be frozen in type, number, and description. They are not frozen. However, IEs defined in IANA's registry are frozen. I’m really concerned that we are using pre-registrations to bypass the WG call. +1 I would prefer to reject early assignment requests, eg without an RFC. P.
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
