On Nov 26, 2024, at 8:40 AM, Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> Hi, so I posted -08 of pcaplinktype in an attempt to correct the HTML, but
> that didn't work. I upgraded to xml2rfc 3.25 locally, and I get mixed
> results.
> I asked online, and was told that there are CSS issues with the HTML produced
> on the DT, and I've filed a bug report. The TXT file (and XML) are correct
> and readable.
The document at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype
lacks blank lines between the link-layer type stanzas.
However, the "txt" button in the "Other formats" section links to
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype-08.txt
which *does* have blank lines between the stanzas.
On the other hand, the "html" button links to
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype-08.html
which has blank lines between the lines *in* the stanzas, but no extra blank
lines between the stanzas.
The "Editor's Copy" text version at
https://ietf-opsawg-wg.github.io/draft-ietf-opsawg-pcap/draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype.txt
resembles the draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype-08.txt version, but the HTML
version at
https://ietf-opsawg-wg.github.io/draft-ietf-opsawg-pcap/draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype.html
doesn't have the issue that the draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype-08.html version
does.
The HTML version problems might be the CSS issues you refer to.
I'm not sure what produces the
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype
as it looks like an "HTMLized text" version, using fixed-width text but
containing links. I'm not sure what produces that.
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
