Dear IPPM community, I bring to your attention draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-characterization <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-characterization/>. The draft was in OPSAWG's Last Call, and several substantive comments <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/?gbt=1&index=yNscOvy3lWcYfhQFdC8lBD7E6PA> were received that referenced RFC 7799 published by IPPM WG. OPSAWG Chairs concluded the WG LC <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/yNscOvy3lWcYfhQFdC8lBD7E6PA/>. IPPM WG is the recognized center of competence in developing performance metrics and performance measurement methods that are the essence of Performance Monitoring OAM. As you know, the IPPM WG has published many protocol specifications related to OAM. As the Shepherd of draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-characterization, I invite IPPM WG to review the draft and share your comments with OPSAWG on its mailing list.
Regards, Greg ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jclarke=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> Date: Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 9:25 AM Subject: [OPSAWG]WG LAST CALL: Guidelines for Charactering "OAM" To: opsawg@ietf.org <opsawg@ietf.org> This starts a two week WG LC https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-characterization/. The authors have been polled and there is no known IPR on this work that has been disclosed at this time. Please post comments and thoughts on this document’s readiness to the list. We ultimately want to run publication of this in conjunction with the on-path telemetry document. Thanks to Greg Mirsky who agreed to shepherd this draft. The WG LC will run until November 4. Thanks. Joe _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
