Dear Joe et al., Thank you for informing about the Chairs' decision and pointing to the way forward. During the WG LC, several reviewers pointed out that the proposed change in the OAM terminology may impact WGs that develop OAM protocols. For example, IPPM WG, the recognized center of competence for the Performance Monitoring OAM mechanisms and performance metrics, or WGs in the Routing area that develop new or extend existing protocols and mechanisms for defect detection and localization in a network, i.e., Fault Management OAM. As I could find (thank you, Carlos, for pointing that out), the last communication to IPPM and SPRING WGs dates back to early January of this year, well before the WG AP and LC were announced. As the Shepherd of this document and to facilitate a broader discussion among the relevant WGs, in a few days, I will be reaching out to IPPM, DetNet, BIER, SPRING, and MPLS WGs, inviting them to review and share their comments about the draft and proposed terminology with OPSAWG community. Please let me know if you have any concerns and suggestions.
Regards, Greg On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 3:00 PM Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jclarke= 40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > This concludes this WG LC. The authors received several WG comments as > well as one from GEN ART. As we said at the mic this morning, the chairs > will wait for the authors to work through the comments and discuss some of > the main points with those raising them. They will bring forth a new > revision, and we can then decide how to move forward on this work. > > > > This draft will not move forward to the IESG at this time. It remains a > WG document. > > > > Joe > > > > *From: *Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jcla...@cisco.com> > *Date: *Monday, October 21, 2024 at 12:21 > *To: *opsawg@ietf.org <opsawg@ietf.org> > *Subject: *WG LAST CALL: Guidelines for Charactering "OAM" > > This starts a two week WG LC > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-characterization/. > The authors have been polled and there is no known IPR on this work that > has been disclosed at this time. > > > > Please post comments and thoughts on this document’s readiness to the > list. We ultimately want to run publication of this in conjunction with > the on-path telemetry document. Thanks to Greg Mirsky who agreed to > shepherd this draft. > > > > The WG LC will run until November 4. > > > > Thanks. > > > > Joe > > > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org >
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
