Hi Sabine, Luis, Jordi, and Roland, (without the CATS chair fez) (Ccing opsawg as the draft is in the IETF#121 agenda)
Many thanks for the effort put into this document. FWIW, you may find a review of the document at: * pdf: https://github.com/boucadair/IETF-Drafts-Reviews/blob/master/2024/draft-rcr-opsawg-operational-compute-metrics-08-rev%20Med.pdf * doc: https://github.com/boucadair/IETF-Drafts-Reviews/raw/refs/heads/master/2024/draft-rcr-opsawg-operational-compute-metrics-08-rev%20Med.doc The document includes interesting background material. I like much Section 6 and the overall document spirit to leverage existing tools and mechanisms. I also appreciate the approach of unifying metrics definition to cover several uses in the service deployment/invocation process. The document can be simplified, though. For example, the use cases can be delegated to existing documents such as CATS use cases I-D. The document can also be better scoped. For example, I would offload the protocol machinery discussion. I understand the authors prefer to leverage ALTO but I'm afraid mixing the protocol machinery vs. the metric characterization makes the scope of the document difficult to handle. The document includes some applicability to the CATS case but with more focus on the service activation and placement selection problems. The various mapping tables you provided are good inputs to dig more on the granularity of the metrics that need to be used for CATS (and thus feed C-PS components, in particular). Please note that the current mapping in the draft does not list the service contact instances. Hope this helps. Cheers, Med ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
