>>    Name:     draft-gasser-opsawg-prefix-lengths
>>    URL:      
>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-gasser-opsawg-prefix-lengths-01.txt
>
> Also take a look at my draft draft-levine-6man-repsize which we have
> discussed in 6man. It proposes a design that is essentially identical.

no.  aside from lightness of motivation, it does not cover ipv4.  this
is the OPS area, and we operators are still stuck with ipv4 being
dominant.

there is a bunch of micro stuff we learned in the 9092/9632 process.
e.g. the remarks: token, Prefixlen is capitalized because RPSL folk and
rfced.

> They were developed independently, suggesting that great* minds think
> alike.

at least draft-gasser-opsawg-prefix-lengths acknowledges that it is a
riff off 9092/9632 and its predecessors by much of the same author list.
[ we're chasing 8805 folk. ]  giving cred is painless and helps form a
positive culture.

ghod, it is becoming hard to be more disheartened by the ietf.

randy

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to