Alex,
A quick fix for draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry:
- s/encapsulation node/encapsulating node/g
- s/decapsulation node/decapsulating node/g
Cheers,
Justin
On 7/23/24 14:38, Alex Huang Feng wrote:
Dear authors,
Thanks a lot for writing and pushing this draft. It is very useful.
I only want to raise that our draft is now having a normative reference
to draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-characterization.
We are using the terms “encapsulation", “transit" and “decapsulation"
node in
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry/> (See section 2 Terminology)
I would like to get the opinion from the authors on whether the
definition of these terms is stable enough to be used already on other
documents.
The reason I am asking is because
draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry is currently very close to get
a WGLC and we were wondering if using the terms from
oam-characterization is the way to go.
Regards,
Alex, on behalf of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry authors
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
