Hi Michael/Joe, I looked at the minutes of NETMOD from 119, and Kent’s comment was that:
It sounds like you are still experimenting on this. I suggest to bring it back and give an update when you are ready and we can guage interest. There was no suggestion that it should be taken to OPSAWG. Thanks. > On Jul 15, 2024, at 9:08 AM, Joe Clarke (jclarke) > <jclarke=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > Thanks for the read-through, Michael. > > This work was presented in opsawg and netmod before. At 119, it was > presented in netmod, and Diego got the comment from Kent that this seemed > experimental and to come back when more work has been done. > > Diego wants to discuss the implementation work they’ve done, and I feel this > is a valid comment for his adoption question: should this be in opsawg or > netmod? > > Joe > > From: Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca > <mailto:mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>> > Date: Monday, July 15, 2024 at 11:51 > To: opsawg@ietf.org <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org> <opsawg@ietf.org > <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>> > Subject: [OPSAWG]draft-lopez-opsawg-yang-provenance > > > Hi Joe, reading the agenda, I was interested in: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lopez-opsawg-yang-provenance/ > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lopez-opsawg-yang-provenance/> > > why isn't this in NETMOD? > > -- > Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca <mailto:mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>> . > o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) > Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide > > > > > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org> > To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org > <mailto:opsawg-le...@ietf.org> Mahesh Jethanandani mjethanand...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
