Thanks for the read-through, Michael. This work was presented in opsawg and netmod before. At 119, it was presented in netmod, and Diego got the comment from Kent that this seemed experimental and to come back when more work has been done.
Diego wants to discuss the implementation work they’ve done, and I feel this is a valid comment for his adoption question: should this be in opsawg or netmod? Joe From: Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> Date: Monday, July 15, 2024 at 11:51 To: opsawg@ietf.org <opsawg@ietf.org> Subject: [OPSAWG]draft-lopez-opsawg-yang-provenance Hi Joe, reading the agenda, I was interested in: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lopez-opsawg-yang-provenance/ why isn't this in NETMOD? -- Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org