Thanks for the read-through, Michael.

This work was presented in opsawg and netmod before.  At 119, it was presented 
in netmod, and Diego got the comment from Kent that this seemed experimental 
and to come back when more work has been done.

Diego wants to discuss the implementation work they’ve done, and I feel this is 
a valid comment for his adoption question: should this be in opsawg or netmod?

Joe

From: Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>
Date: Monday, July 15, 2024 at 11:51
To: opsawg@ietf.org <opsawg@ietf.org>
Subject: [OPSAWG]draft-lopez-opsawg-yang-provenance

Hi Joe, reading the agenda, I was interested in:
  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lopez-opsawg-yang-provenance/

why isn't this in NETMOD?

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide



_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to