I want to close out this WG LC. Based on comments from the working group and authors, we are going to hold this draft in the WG for now. There is an outstanding question on external PSKs where more WG input is needed (the authors have proposed two choices on this front). Additionally, we have some SEC DIR feedback pending.
When the PSK issue is sorted and other feedback from SEC DIR resolved, we can take this to another WG LC. Moreover, we need authors and named contributors to respond to the IPR poll. Thank you to the authors and shepherd for keeping on top of the WG and other’s feedback. Joe From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jclarke=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> Date: Monday, June 24, 2024 at 08:36 To: opsawg@ietf.org <opsawg@ietf.org> Cc: u...@ietf.org <u...@ietf.org> Subject: [OPSAWG]WG LC: draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13 With shepherd in hand (thanks, Med), we are kicking off a two-week working group last call for the TACACS+ secured with TLS 1.3 draft. This draft has received several reviews, and the authors have addressed all outstanding comments. That said, I have re-requested reviews from SEC DIR and OPS DIR to confirm it has resolved previously-raised issues. The question about port seems to have been addressed with a custom port being an appropriate proposal. The chairs would like all comments and feedback by July 8, 2024. We will be re-running the IPR poll in parallel. (Copying TLS in Applications [uta] list for more TLS application-layer visibility.) Thanks. Joe
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
