On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 10:17:20AM -0600, Kenneth Vaughn wrote: > > "all these references" > RFC 7407 > draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif-09.txt > any other imports of this YANG definition > > > the values in the TLS HashAlgorithm > > registry are only applicable to version of (D)TLS protocol versions > > prior to 1.3. Perhaps we need to let IANA know somehow that > > there are non (D)TLS specifications depending on the registry values > Correct, based on my reading of the standards, I was concerned that, at some > point in the future, hash algorithms might not be assigned the one octet > identifier. This concerned seemed to be shared by several others (e.g., > including those in the TLS community). If we can convince IANA to continue to > assign the one octet values, we should be able to continue to use the > existing fingerprint algorithm. That would then make this update quite minor, > although I believe it still necessary to clarify other ambiguities that arise. >
I am not sure we should go and try to fix problems that are not yet concrete problems. I looked at the numbers registered and there is lots of space left. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
