Joe Clarke \(jclarke\) <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, WG. Kenneth presented > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vaughn-tlstm-update/ at IETF112 > to us, and this was previously presented at SecDispatch at IETF111. The > feeling there was that this work had merit, but Sec didn't have enough > SNMP experience to be the owner. At the AD level, the feeling was that > perhaps opsawg did have the expertise and could pick this up.
I guess I missed this from IETF111. I scanned the document briefly, and I don't see that much that requires *SNMP*-fu, so much as it requires TLS-fu. I think that the document will get lost in OPSAWG. Traditionally, WGs do their own MIB modules... so I don't understand why it is not in TLS. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
