> +1
>
> I think it is better to have all three types explicitly in the value. Perhaps
> this could also be the default?
>
> Lada
> [Bo] Please see if the definition below is correct:
> typedef tcsplus-server-type {
Why not spell out tacacsplus?
> type bits {
> bit authentication {
> description
> "When set, the server is an authentication server.";
> }
> bit authorization {
> description
> "When set, the server is an authorization server.";
> }
> bit accounting {
> description
> "When set, the server is an accounting server.";
> }
> bit all {
> description
> "When set, the server can be all types of TACACS+ servers.";
> }
As Lada and Tom have said, I wouldn’t do “all” here. With only three options,
having them be explicitly listed is a good thing IMHO.
Joe
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
