> - Is it correct that the server type may be either one of "authentication", > "authorization" or "accounting", or all of them? Is it impossible for a > server to be authentication & authorization but not accounting? Such a > variant cannot be configured. > [Bo] OK, will correct when the final guidance on this issue is received.
Lada replied yesterday to say that the bit string is likely preferred similar to access-operations in ietf-netconf-acm. I might personally discourage the use of ‘*’ for this given that there are only three types, but that’s just my individual thought. Joe _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
