On 08.02.18 21:53, Melinda Shore wrote: > On 2/8/18 5:01 AM, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) wrote: >> Without any judgement, this is an informational document, so it does >> not necessarily need to have IETF consensus for publication. > Generally I'm in favor of being pretty relaxed about informational > documents that describe a real thing in the world, but for better > or worse this document is taking the form of a position statement > and I think needs to reflect that position more accurately.
That, I think. is the issue. This *shouldn't* be a position statement. I think it would be good if that were explicit. It's meant more of a point of view about some of the problems some folk are facing. Eliot
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
