Without any judgement, this is an informational document, so it does not necessarily need to have IETF consensus for publication.
Mirja > Am 08.02.2018 um 11:17 schrieb Randy Bush <[email protected]>: > >>> Unfortunately, the fundamental concern that motivated my DISCUSS >>> remains: I do not believe that this document matches the consensus >>> of the IETF community. >> That's an interesting claim. >> If the process has not been followed, this requires facts as opposed >> to "believes". >> We should make sure to make a distinction between the IETF community >> views and your own views. > > 1984 7258 7625 ... and dogged comments on this draft; though some of us > have grew a bit weary of the denial game and allowed ourselves to be > shut up. > > randy > _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
