Hi David, I can present a few slides but the Tuesday 6am Pacific slot does not work well for me (this is right in the middle of my Tuesday mornings commute), perhaps Mark can handle this?
We’re in the process of discussing the versioning situation in OPNFV test projects, with question such as how can a project benefit from an independent release model and what would be the practical impact for the teams, whether it could also follow the OPNFV release model.... I think it would be good to have a first feedback from each project PTL, as of now, the only projects I know of that support independent release and versioning are Storperf and nfvbench. These 2 also happen to also follow the OPNFV release cycle although I’m not sure for how much longer. I had some discussion with Vsperf, Yardstick, Bottleneck teams and I think they need a bit of time to digest/think about the options. Functest is clearly very much aligned with OPNFV release as it is gating it. I am still very unclear what other test project is gating directly OPNFV release? Would you or Trevor happen to know? I have not got any discussion with any other test project team but would be happy to (email looks easiest method). Thanks Alec From: David McBride <dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org> Date: Thursday, August 16, 2018 at 11:00 AM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" <ahot...@cisco.com> Cc: Tapio Tallgren <tapio.tallg...@nokia.com>, "Beierl, Mark" <mark.bei...@dell.com>, TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Suggestion: CI/CD Release and Tagging Hi Alec, I suggest that you put together some slides to present to the weekly technical discussion meeting; get feedback; then make a proposal to the TSC. Thanks. David On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 10:25 AM Alec via Lists.Opnfv.Org<http://Lists.Opnfv.Org> <ahothan=cisco....@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:cisco....@lists.opnfv.org>> wrote: Thanks for pointing that out Mark, I have been asking for this for almost 2 years and we’re finally able to do that. TBH I’m not sure what the TSC can say other than approve it since that is in direct alignment with a former TSC decision to promote the use of OPNFV project outside of OPNFV platforms and with a key decision in Fraser to change the format of OPNFV release tags to use opnfv prefixed tags and reserve 3-digit versioning tags for project specific releases. In the normal course of events, we should now slowly be moving every active test project versioning to use their own 3-digit versioning and have PTLs drive their respective release in a much more rational way and ultimately allow OPNFV releases to gate their releases using independently versioned OPNFV tools (in the same way they would use any other non-OPNFV tools). This should also simplify and lighten up quite a bit the load on OPNFV releng and release management. Alec From: <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>> on behalf of Tapio Tallgren <tapio.tallg...@nokia.com<mailto:tapio.tallg...@nokia.com>> Date: Wednesday, August 15, 2018 at 11:01 PM To: Mark Beierl <mark.bei...@dell.com<mailto:mark.bei...@dell.com>>, "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>" <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Suggestion: CI/CD Release and Tagging Hi, I would like to make this a TSC sanctioned method... Task for Release Process WG... -Tapio ________________________________________ From: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>> on behalf of Mark Beierl <mark.bei...@dell.com<mailto:mark.bei...@dell.com>> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2018 4:40:24 AM To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Suggestion: CI/CD Release and Tagging Hello all! I noticed there has been a fair amount of discussion about individual projects releasing independently of the OPNFV full (Gambia, etc) release cycle. I thought I would mention that the current OPNFV tagging strategy does support arbitrary tags for docker releases. Therefore if your project releases artifacts via docker push, it is currently possible to simply push a tag and that will cause a release to be published to docker hub. I do not know if this is an officially TSC sanctioned method, but if there is an immediate demand from end users (ie, yes I have been asked for ‘stable’ releases for StorPerf), then you can push a tag and that will publish the artifact to docker hub and represent a milestone in your project. Just my $0.02 (CAD) for what it is worth these days :) Regards, Mark Mark Beierl SW System Sr Principal Developer Dell EMC | Cloud & Communication Service Provider Solution mark.bei...@dell.com<mailto:mark.bei...@dell.com><mailto:mark.bei...@dell.com> -- David McBride Release Manager, OPNFV Mobile: +1.805.276.8018<javascript:void(0);> Email/Google Talk: dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org> Skype: davidjmcbride1 IRC: dmcbride -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#21783): https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/message/21783 Mute This Topic: https://lists.opnfv.org/mt/24557263/21656 Group Owner: opnfv-tech-discuss+ow...@lists.opnfv.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
