As promised, here's a new spreadsheet with updated wiki contributor data. Now the data should show beyond top 50 contributors and list anyone who contributed to the wiki in 2017. Bitergia also fixed a bug they had as there were some undercounting of "page edits".
Thanks, Ray On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Raymond Paik <rp...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > A couple of clarifications. > > When we say a "union of contributions" across all tools, we're setting a > bar for total contributions across Git, Gerrit, Jira, and wiki. So for > example, if you had done 50 reviews + 2 merged patches + 30 Jira activities > + 20 wiki edits, you have a 102 total contributions (and you'd clear the > hurdle for either 50 or 100 contributions). The discussion was that this > maybe simpler than setting a different bar/hurdle for each tool. > > As for the mailing list/IRC contributions, the difficulty comes with > identity mapping. Trying to map IRC NICs/or email addresses with IDs used > for the other tools is very challenging and will involve a lot of manual > process. > > Hope this helps. > > Thanks, > > Ray > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 6:28 AM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) < > bryan.sulli...@research.att.com> wrote: > >> I echo Dave's recommendation to be inclusive. The main reason not to be >> exclusive AIUI is to prevent gaming of the voting process. There are two >> ways to address that, while remaining inclusive: >> >> 1) set a reasonably low bar for participation >> >> IMO anyone that is a regular attendee in OPNFV TSC or technical community >> calls, has made any level of peer-reviewed commit (outside their own >> company) over the last year, etc should be included. There are a core of >> people that should be obvious to us all, as involved, and they should >> certainly not be excluded. These include all current TSC members, PTLs, >> active committers, anyone active in any form of discussion, anyone >> contributing content in any form (code, tests, docs, wiki, ...), ... >> >> 2) provide a means for process concerns to be raised and addressed by the >> TSC >> >> Dave's concern is an example. We need to be open to any such concern as a >> sign the process needs to be improved or an exception needs to be made >> (which really means the process needs to be improved, but for some reason >> we are not able to at this time...). Other types of concern may be raised >> by analytics on the voting process, which should be shared with the >> community (every voter should be associated with a member company, or >> identified as independent, so we can ensure reasonable equity in the voting >> process). There should be a place on the wiki etc for raising these >> concerns so they can be tracked and the thread of addressing them is >> recorded. >> >> Thanks, >> Bryan Sullivan | AT&T >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: opnfv-tsc-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tsc-bounces@list >> s.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Dave Neary >> Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2018 5:49 AM >> To: Raymond Paik <rp...@linuxfoundation.org>; opnfv-tech-discuss < >> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>; opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org >> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tsc] [opnfv-tech-discuss] For the TSC composition >> discussion on Tuesday >> >> [Note post TSC call: this is the email I had written and found in my >> Drafts folder after the TSC call - so I had not sent it - DN] >> >> Thank you for putting this together, Ray! >> >> A few comments: Your wiki stats look off - I would expect to see many >> more people in the list (of course the first thing I did out of vanity >> was look for myself, and I have definitely made a number of wiki edits >> and comments, but I am not in the list). >> >> We have so far discussed erring on the side of inclusion, so I am >> curious about your setting a bar at 50 or 100 contributions. It might >> make sense to have a minimum number for some of the lower impact >> activities like Gerrit reviews, but for others like patch submission, a >> lower bound of 1 might make more sense. For wiki edits 5 or 10 seems >> reasonable. If using a composite metric, I would lean towards a lower >> number (say, 20) rather than higher, to be more inclusive. >> >> Have you considered being active on the mailing list as a potential >> market of activity? Again the question of whether people who are active >> on the list, but inactive elsewhere, can be considered active >> contributors (I think they could) - there, perhaps 30 emails during the >> year is a good level. >> >> I would also be interested to hear if there are people who previously >> had a vote as committers, who would not have a vote under this scheme, >> or whether there is a big difference in the size of the >> community/electorate with your proposed levels. >> >> What do you think? >> >> Thanks, >> Dave. >> >> On 02/12/2018 01:12 AM, Raymond Paik wrote: >> > All, >> > >> > This is for the TSC composition discussion on Tuesday. >> > >> > As was discussed previously >> > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ >> meetbot.opnfv.org_meetings_opnfv-2Dmeeting_2018_opnfv- >> 2Dmeeting.2018-2D01-2D25-2D14.01.html&d=DwIGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_ >> HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=ML-JPRZQOfToJjMwlJLPlcWimAEwMA5DZGNIrk- >> cgy0&m=j4ERu-qaIYwZd3po8SudCWwCLvGnJv26WnMdWkuiRpE&s=ztF7-od >> HiEl7gs1G6jacfMrhQBZ4ES-Mm4P_Ci92yHQ&e= >, >> > there was a consensus to look at a "union of contributions" across >> > various tools in OPNFV including Git, Gerrit, JIRA, and Confluence. For >> > example, we talked about people making a total of 50 or 100 >> > contributions across all tools over a 12 month period as the constituent >> > for the TSC election. >> > >> > In the attached, you'll see the data point across the 4 tools in 2017. >> > In the last tab, you'll also find a comparison of "top 50 contributors" >> > across the tools. Although there are some exceptions, you'll see that >> > active contributors are active across all 4 tools. One of the concerns >> > was that we want to be inclusive to recognize non-code contributions and >> > you'll see a high number of non-code contributors in both Gerrit and >> Jira. >> > >> > In terms of a threshold, 100 annual contributions seems like a good >> > starting point. As a point of reference, the following shows the number >> > of people that made 100 or more contributions in each tool. (Based on >> > this, we'll have a minimum of 112 people eligible for the TSC election >> > as we have 112 people that made 100 or more contributions to Gerrit >> alone) >> > >> > * Gerrit: 112 >> > * Git: 30 >> > * JIRA: 36 >> > * Wiki: 4 >> > >> > If we go to 50 annual contributions, I don't necessarily think there'll >> > be a significant increase in the pool and following is the breakdown. >> > >> > * Gerrit: 137 >> > * Git: 51 >> > * JIRA: 62 >> > * Wiki: 8 >> > >> > Please feel free to reply with any thoughts or feedback. This will be >> > discussed further during the TSC call. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > Ray >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list >> > opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org >> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.o >> pnfv.org_mailman_listinfo_opnfv-2Dtech-2Ddiscuss&d=DwIGaQ&c= >> LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=ML-JPRZQOfToJjMwlJLPlcWimAEwMA5DZGN >> Irk-cgy0&m=j4ERu-qaIYwZd3po8SudCWwCLvGnJv26WnMdWkuiRpE&s=sjp >> TzAmiWoJ3tIYyUtpwuvMB8DzL6CMsDkRGUGlDHFY&e= >> > >> >> -- >> Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy >> Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - https://urldefense.proofpoint. >> com/v2/url?u=http-3A__community.redhat.com&d=DwIGaQ&c=LFYZ- >> o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=ML-JPRZQOfToJjMwlJLPlcWimAEwMA5DZGNIrk- >> cgy0&m=j4ERu-qaIYwZd3po8SudCWwCLvGnJv26WnMdWkuiRpE&s= >> IwW1CegmvvP4zo-XHiKleGgvL9pa5L9EpckH6CKuiZ8&e= >> Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338 >> _______________________________________________ >> opnfv-tsc mailing list >> opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.o >> pnfv.org_mailman_listinfo_opnfv-2Dtsc&d=DwIGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_ >> HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=ML-JPRZQOfToJjMwlJLPlcWimAEwMA5DZGNIrk- >> cgy0&m=j4ERu-qaIYwZd3po8SudCWwCLvGnJv26WnMdWkuiRpE&s= >> BOUoUmt8HhzWWZo_upX24dTkb-b7F-gQHj31AcB7xs4&e= >> > >
2017 active contributors v4.xlsx
Description: MS-Excel 2007 spreadsheet
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
