On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 04:56:13PM +0000, Wenjing Chu wrote: > There is an hour allocated for this topic. I’d encourage everyone interested, > esp. TSC members, please make an effort to join: > > > > - Day 2, Tuesday, 14:00 - 15:00, Sculpture Room, Dovetail Danube status > and release planning, consideration of OPNFV projects in Danube, and tutorial > session > > > > And if needed, this session can be extended to the next hour which currently > is > allocated for Euphrates topics but less urgent. There is also a TSC/board > joint > meeting on Friday that has a dedicated timeslot to report on CVP. With both > sessions, we may have the time needed. Tapio, I’m not sure how practical of > scheduling another meeting with the TSC at this point, but Chris’s point is a > good one, maybe we can ask/encourage TSC members to join the Dovetail session > above in order to facilitate quicker resolution. Thanks.
Sounds like a plan! The scope discussion for Dovetail is an important one, so let's use this slot for that. -Tapio > > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Christopher Price > Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2017 3:38 AM > To: Tianhongbo <[email protected]>; Tallgren, Tapio > <[email protected]> > Cc: TSC OPNFV <[email protected]>; TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV > <[email protected]> > Subject: [opnfv-tsc] [dovetail] TSC and DoveTail meeting to discuss scope and > needs for CVP testing > > > > Hi Tapio/HongBo, > > > > On this weeks TSC call I understood there was an identified need for some form > of working session between the TSC and the DoveTail team to describe the > wanted > /needed scope of CVP testing that DoveTail should develop for the CVP in any > given release. > > As a number of us we will be in Beijing next week would this be a good > opportunity to start such a dialog? We have things like DoveTail Euphrates > planning etc on the agenda, but it would seem that we have an urgent need to > set the scope of Danube together with the TSC as a basic pre-requisite to any > other planning work. > > > > Do we have sufficient representation at the event for such a dialog? > > Could we potentially reallocate one of the scheduled hours to facilitate such > a > discussion? > > > > I don’t think we should ignore the feedback from this weeks TSC meeting, it > would seem urgent that we get this done so that we can make progress on the > right things moving forward if we hope to launch something this year. > > If we are not able to do this next week, I would propose we find another way > to > close this gap asap as it would seem to be urgent in the context of getting > the > CVP going. > > > > Cheers, > > Chris > _______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
