There is an hour allocated for this topic. I’d encourage everyone interested, esp. TSC members, please make an effort to join:
- Day 2, Tuesday, 14:00 - 15:00, Sculpture Room, Dovetail Danube status and release planning, consideration of OPNFV projects in Danube, and tutorial session And if needed, this session can be extended to the next hour which currently is allocated for Euphrates topics but less urgent. There is also a TSC/board joint meeting on Friday that has a dedicated timeslot to report on CVP. With both sessions, we may have the time needed. Tapio, I’m not sure how practical of scheduling another meeting with the TSC at this point, but Chris’s point is a good one, maybe we can ask/encourage TSC members to join the Dovetail session above in order to facilitate quicker resolution. Thanks. Wenjing From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Christopher Price Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2017 3:38 AM To: Tianhongbo <[email protected]>; Tallgren, Tapio <[email protected]> Cc: TSC OPNFV <[email protected]>; TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <[email protected]> Subject: [opnfv-tsc] [dovetail] TSC and DoveTail meeting to discuss scope and needs for CVP testing Hi Tapio/HongBo, On this weeks TSC call I understood there was an identified need for some form of working session between the TSC and the DoveTail team to describe the wanted/needed scope of CVP testing that DoveTail should develop for the CVP in any given release. As a number of us we will be in Beijing next week would this be a good opportunity to start such a dialog? We have things like DoveTail Euphrates planning etc on the agenda, but it would seem that we have an urgent need to set the scope of Danube together with the TSC as a basic pre-requisite to any other planning work. Do we have sufficient representation at the event for such a dialog? Could we potentially reallocate one of the scheduled hours to facilitate such a discussion? I don’t think we should ignore the feedback from this weeks TSC meeting, it would seem urgent that we get this done so that we can make progress on the right things moving forward if we hope to launch something this year. If we are not able to do this next week, I would propose we find another way to close this gap asap as it would seem to be urgent in the context of getting the CVP going. Cheers, Chris
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
