Does the nova scheduler log tell anything useful about why there are not enough hosts available?

Since you are running in a VM, it could be that you really do not have enough hosts.

-Tapio




On 03/08/2017 12:54 PM, Marco Varlese wrote:
Hi,

I can create manually an instance with the "openstack server create".

However, when yardstick does its magic I get the following error:
====
Writing /home/stack/yardstick_venv/lib/python2.7/site-packages/yardstick-0.1.dev0-py2.7.egg/yardstick/resources/files/yardstick_key-e9b9c7c2 ...
Deploying context 'demo-86b44547'
2017-03-08 11:33:12,907 yardstick.orchestrator.heat heat.py:450 INFO Creating stack 'demo-86b44547' error: failed to deploy stack: 'Resource CREATE failed: ResourceInError: resources.athena.demo-86b44547: Went to status ERROR due to "Message: No valid host was found. There are not enough hosts available., Code: 500"'
Undeploying all contexts
====

And then - if I check the status:

(yardstick_venv) stack@wingenfelder <mailto:stack@wingenfelder>:~/yardstick> openstack server list
+--------------------------------------+----------------------+--------+------------------------------+--------------+
| ID | Name | Status | Networks | Image Name |
+--------------------------------------+----------------------+--------+------------------------------+--------------+
| c91fba90-500b-4c8e-86c3-f08b67a4f5e0 | athena.demo-86b44547 | ERROR | | cirros-0.3.3 | | 14a415e9-adaa-4d8a-b465-e9ccff85cbd8 | ares.demo-86b44547 | ACTIVE | demo-86b44547-test=10.0.1.11 | cirros-0.3.3 |
+--------------------------------------+----------------------+--------+------------------------------+--------------+


Thanks,
Marco

On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 06:11 +0000, chenjiankun wrote:

Hi,

Can you create an instance using openstack command manually?

Using the follow command:

openstack server create --image cirros-0.3.3 --flavor m1.small --nic net-id=net04_ext server_name

(you need to replace the flavor and nic value with your own.

Using the follow command to get all flavors:

openstack flavor list

Using the follow command to get all network:

         openstack network list

)

If you can create a instance, I think maybe there is something wrong with yardstick.

If failed to create an instance, maybe there is something wrong with the environment.

Regards,

Jack Chan

*From:*opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org <mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org> [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] *On Behalf Of *Marco Varlese
*Sent:* Thursday, March 02, 2017 9:34 PM
*To:* Tapio Tallgren; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org <mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
*Subject:* Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [yardstick] Yardstick run-time issue

On Thu, 2017-03-02 at 14:34 +0200, Tapio Tallgren wrote:

    On 03/02/2017 02:15 PM, Marco Varlese wrote:

        On Thu, 2017-03-02 at 13:41 +0200, Tapio Tallgren wrote:

            On 03/02/2017 10:45 AM, Marco Varlese wrote:

                Hi,

                In my previous email I did not mention the use of the
                docker image, I was trying to install it on the
                system following the online Yardstick documentation.

                Why do I need to use the docker image necessarily?

            I have been using a kvm VM for Yardstick. Docker is
            easier to use since you do not need to set up the virtenv
            etc.


            Also, are there any particular reasons/dependencies why
            it has to be Ubuntu 14.04? It's quite "old" and the new
            LTS (16.04) has been out for a while.


            I just used the Xenial Ubuntu and it worked equally well.
            I downloaded and booted the Xenial image, git cloned
            Yardstick to it, and then installed Yardstick on it. For
            reporting, I used a Docker image.

        How did you setup the Openstack environment?

        In my case I cloned DevStack (master) and installed it on the
        box.

        My setup has everything installed onto one single VM:

        1) DevStack (with Heat)

        2) Yardstick with its virtual-env

        And when I try launch the ping.yaml test case I get the error
        mentioned in my prev email...

        Any thoughts/ideas?


    I had a physical deployment. Since you are running everything in
    a VM, it is best to use the virtenv and not launch another VM.
    Can you use the "openstack server list" command from the
    Yardstick virtenv? Do you see cirros-0.3.3 when you do "openstack
    image list"? I think there was some confusion about cirros-0.3.3
    and cirros-0.3.4, but I cannot find the reference right now.

Yes I can see it... I downloaded the image from http://download.cirros-cloud.net/0.3.3/cirros-0.3.3-x86_64-disk.img

and installed it via glance...

+--------------------------------------+--------------------------+--------+

| ID | Name | Status |

+--------------------------------------+--------------------------+--------+

| 03e72a29-88fc-4be7-90e4-70173fa80ce2 | cirros-0.3.3 | active |

+--------------------------------------+--------------------------+--------+

====

I just redeployed everything on a physical machine... just following the same steps... the error I get now is different

Writing /root/yardstick_venv/lib/python2.7/site-packages/yardstick-0.1.dev0-py2.7.egg/yardstick/resources/files/yardstick_key-1d2a644a ...

Deploying context 'demo-d3c047d1'

2017-03-02 14:22:26,407 yardstick.orchestrator.heat heat.py:450 INFO Creating stack 'demo-d3c047d1'

error: failed to deploy stack: 'ERROR: <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN">

<html><head>

<title>504 Gateway Timeout</title>

</head><body>

<h1>Gateway Timeout</h1>

<p>The gateway did not receive a timely response

from the upstream server or application.</p>

</body></html>

'

Undeploying all contexts

======

These are my ENV variables:

OS_PROJECT_DOMAIN_ID=default

OS_REGION_NAME=RegionOne

OS_USER_DOMAIN_ID=default

OS_PROJECT_NAME=demo

OS_IDENTITY_API_VERSION=3

OS_PASSWORD=secret

OS_AUTH_URL=http://AA.BBB.CC.DDD:5000/v2.0 <http://10.161.8.252:5000/v2.0>

OS_USERNAME=demo

OS_TENANT_NAME=demo

OS_VOLUME_API_VERSION=2

EXTERNAL_NETWORK=net04_ext

Interestingly, the openrc file (which I have to source) by default uses v3 for the OS_AUTH_URL but I had to change it to v2.0 because Yardstick was complaining with the following error:

error: failed to deploy stack: 'Expecting to find domain in project. The server could not comply with the request since it is either malformed or otherwise incorrect. The client is assumed to be in error. (HTTP 400) (Request-ID: req-dff1cdff-1eeb-40a5-94a4-b250444ed32b)'


    -Tapio


    Thanks,

    Marco


        -Tapio


        Thanks,

        Marco

        On Thu, 2017-03-02 at 08:35 +0000, chenjiankun wrote:

            Hi Marco,

            What’s the latest status of this issue?

            Does my solution be OK for you?

            I’m looking forward to your reply.

            Regards,

            Jack Chan

            *From:*chenjiankun
            *Sent:* Thursday, February 23, 2017 5:25 PM
            *To:* 'Marco Varlese'
            *Cc:* opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
            <mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
            *Subject:* RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [yardstick] Yardstick
            run-time issue

            Hi Marco,

            I am Jack from yardstick team.

            I haven’t experienced this issue before. But it seems
            there are some errors with the cirros image.

            I think you can try to run ping test case in the follow
            steps:

            1. *docker run -itd --privileged --name yardstick
            opnfv/yardstick:latest*

            2. *docker exec -it yardstick bash*

            3. config and source the openstack openrc file(include
            EXTERNAL_NETWORK)

            4. load images: you can execute the follow command in
            this directory:

            *cd /home/opnfv/repos/yardstick*

            *bash tests/ci/load_image.sh*

            5. run test case

            *yardstick -d task start sample/ping.yaml*

            BTW, can you tell me:

            1. what’s your Openstack version in your SUT?

            2. Which yardstick docker are you using?

            If you have any other questions, please feel free to let
            me know. Thanks.

            Best Regards,

            Jack Chan

            -----Original Message-----
            From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
            <mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
            [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On
            Behalf Of Marco Varlese
            Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 7:37 PM
            To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
            <mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
            Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Yardstick run-time issue

            Hi,

            I'm trying to setup an environment to deploy Yardstick;
            to start with I'm doing everything in one single Virtual
            machine.

            The Virtual Machine basically represent both the Jumphost
            and the SUT. I understand this is not the best to measure
            performance but my real lab setup is being currently
            worked on and I'd like to get ahead of the game with
            learning.

            I have an Openstack environment installed via Devstack
            (master branch) including Heat.

            When I try and launch the ping.yaml test case I get the
            following error:

            2017-02-21 12:18:29,515 yardstick.orchestrator.heat
            heat.py:440 INFO Creating stack 'demo-054b1f93'

            error: failed to deploy stack: 'ERROR: Property error: :
            resources.ares.demo-

            054b1f93.properties.image: : "cirros-0.3.3" does not
            validate glance.image (constraint not found)'

            Has anybody experienced this issue before?

            Any help or input would be much appreciated.

            Thanks,

            Marco

            _______________________________________________

            opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list

            opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
            <mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>

            https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss




        _______________________________________________

        opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list

        opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
        <mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>

        https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

        _______________________________________________

        opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list

        opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
        <mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>

        https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss


_______________________________________________
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Reply via email to