Joe, If there's an inactive committer (for more than 6 months) and the PTL is not able to reach that committer for whatever reason, the PTL needs to make a request to the TSC to revoke the committer status. The PTL should not do this unilaterally.
Please see the 8th paragraph in the Section 8 of the TSC Charter ( https://www.opnfv.org/developers/technical-project-governance/tsc-charter). .. Thanks, Ray On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 6:18 PM, joehuang <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > In each project's wiki page, we often list committers and contributors, as > OPNFV's ongoing development, some new committers come, some committers grow > other interesting and put less focus on the old project. > > I have one suggestion for the maintenance on committer list: for those who > have shifted interest, for example, not shown in the weekly meeting and > mail-list discussion ( all these could be found in the log) in the past 6 > months, but they forget to send a stepping down notification in the > mail-list, PTL should be able to move the committer to the contributor list > by default, and update the list in the git repository too. > > It's not good idea ( not polite too :-) ) to send mail to ask "hey, would > you continue to contribute in the project, if not, I'll remove you from the > committer list". > > Best Regards > Chaoyi Huang (joehuang) > > _______________________________________________ > opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
