We didn't change the charter but decided (at least no one objected..) to have polestar focus in two areas - mapping the releases to the 5 Goals set by SPC and work with EUG on mapping their user stories/epics to OPNFV projects which will operationalize the user requirements.
We are suggesting to go back to next thurs 12/8 at 11AM EST. We need to get a feel for who will still be able to attend the call. Steven Wright and I will be in China timezone - so we hopefully can do this. If we lose a lot of folks due to the OPNFV plugfest - then we will skip next week and have it 12/15. Again some of us will still be in China due to ETSI ISG NFV meeting Let me know. thanks. On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 6:12 AM, Christopher Price <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Folks, > > > > I will unfortunately not be able to make this meeting due to a conflict. > > I have uploaded the previously published materials around the SPC and > Polestar to the wiki, https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/polestar/Meetings, > for review and discussion this week. > > > > I provide two input items to the discuss and then say that I am more or > less OK with anything else that we agree to. J > > - I would name our initiative the “Polestar group” rather than > “Polestar working group”. > > o This is to align with how we name the “Security group” etc, and not > to confuse what we are doing here with a project area “working group”. > > o The difference is subtle but any clarification we can provide than > helps the community understand how these activities differ from each other > is helpful imho. > > - I would also try to keep the description of the Polestar group > relatively simple and open. > > o Let’s be clear where it fits in, point to our process, but not be > too proscriptive to a scope or set of constraints. > > o We should be helpful in trying to coordinate alignment around useful > things within the community rather than trying to “own” a scope or area. > > > > / Chris > > > > > > *From: *Margaret Chiosi <[email protected]> > *Date: *Monday, 28 November 2016 at 15:26 > *To: *Ash <[email protected]>, Christopher Price < > [email protected]> > *Cc: *TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <[email protected]> > *Subject: *Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [polestar]:next call 11/29. 9am US > east coast. Meeting notes have bridge info > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 13:40 Christopher Price <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I agree Ash, that should be the priority for the next call. > > Once we have a time right I’ll set the agenda and publish the materials I > was going to present last week for Margaret to use for the call. > > / Chris > > > > *From: *<[email protected]> on behalf of Ash < > [email protected]> > *Date: *Tuesday, 22 November 2016 at 19:30 > *To: *Margaret Chiosi <[email protected]> > *Cc: *TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <[email protected]> > *Subject: *Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [polestar]:next call > > > > Hi Margaret, > > > > One of the main things we've been waiting to address is the charter for > Polestar now that SPC has been disbanded, since it's what sanctioned > Polestar. In our last two meetings, we've hit this subject and then > postpone further talks until it gets addressed. While I don't have a > problem shifting times, I think we need to address this. > > > > Best, > > > > Ash > > > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Margaret Chiosi < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Folks: sorry about missing so many meetings. And now I will be traveling > 12/1-17 > > Can we move the meeting for next week to Mon 10 or 11 est or Tue 9 am est > or Wed 10'or 11 est? > We need to synch up. Thanks > > > _______________________________________________ > opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss > > > > _______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss > mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opnfv.org/ > mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss > > -- Margaret Chiosi
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
