Hi Folks,
I will unfortunately not be able to make this meeting due to a conflict. I have uploaded the previously published materials around the SPC and Polestar to the wiki, https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/polestar/Meetings, for review and discussion this week. I provide two input items to the discuss and then say that I am more or less OK with anything else that we agree to. J - I would name our initiative the “Polestar group” rather than “Polestar working group”. o This is to align with how we name the “Security group” etc, and not to confuse what we are doing here with a project area “working group”. o The difference is subtle but any clarification we can provide than helps the community understand how these activities differ from each other is helpful imho. - I would also try to keep the description of the Polestar group relatively simple and open. o Let’s be clear where it fits in, point to our process, but not be too proscriptive to a scope or set of constraints. o We should be helpful in trying to coordinate alignment around useful things within the community rather than trying to “own” a scope or area. / Chris From: Margaret Chiosi <[email protected]> Date: Monday, 28 November 2016 at 15:26 To: Ash <[email protected]>, Christopher Price <[email protected]> Cc: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [polestar]:next call 11/29. 9am US east coast. Meeting notes have bridge info On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 13:40 Christopher Price <[email protected]> wrote: I agree Ash, that should be the priority for the next call. Once we have a time right I’ll set the agenda and publish the materials I was going to present last week for Margaret to use for the call. / Chris From: <[email protected]> on behalf of Ash <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, 22 November 2016 at 19:30 To: Margaret Chiosi <[email protected]> Cc: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [polestar]:next call Hi Margaret, One of the main things we've been waiting to address is the charter for Polestar now that SPC has been disbanded, since it's what sanctioned Polestar. In our last two meetings, we've hit this subject and then postpone further talks until it gets addressed. While I don't have a problem shifting times, I think we need to address this. Best, Ash On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Margaret Chiosi <[email protected]> wrote: Folks: sorry about missing so many meetings. And now I will be traveling 12/1-17 Can we move the meeting for next week to Mon 10 or 11 est or Tue 9 am est or Wed 10'or 11 est? We need to synch up. Thanks _______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss _______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
