Hi guys, Thank you for your work.
Gergely, I was thinking that you can close your Jira tickets. We should create new ones covering potential updates of the corresponding sections based on the feedback we’ll receive. What do you think? Georg From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2016 7:47 AM To: Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [netready] start point for contribution. Hi. I'll check it. my username is: FatemehA > Hi, > > I’ve added a figure to chapter 2.4, 2.5.1 and 2.5.2. > Please check and comment: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/17919/ > > @Fathemeh: I could not find you in the gerrit users list, sorry for that. > > Br, > Gerg0 > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > [email protected] > Sent: Monday, August 01, 2016 8:37 AM > To: Georg Kunz ; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [netready] start point for > contribution. > > > Hi Georg, > > Sorry for answering too late; > > As you mentioned, I reviewed requirement’s document and I think the > following points should be considered: > > 1. In sections 2.1.1, 2.1.3.1 , 2.4, I think a picture could make > descriptions more clear. > > 2. In sections 2.5.1 and 2.5.2, I think two high level architeture > pictures could show how instances or clouds's networks would be > seprated.) > ( as a sample: > docs.openstack.org/mitaka/networking-guide/scenario-provider-ovs.html) > > > > I’m working on finding a good example for your suggested part (2.4.2), > > I think these scenarios are not bad : > http://docs.openstack.org/mitaka/networking-guide/scenario-provider-lb.html > , > http://docs.openstack.org/mitaka/networking-guide/scenario-provider-ovs.html > , but actually I’m not sure; > > So I’m digging into Neutron provider and tenant networks in openstack to > give you a good example. > > > > P.S. I have direct access to Gerrit and indirect access to opnfv > requirement’s doc (using VPN), but we want to have direct access because > the sanctions against Iran were lifted.:) > > > >> Hi Fathemeh, >> >> Great. Gergely (in CC) is the main author of those use cases, so you >> can >> contact him or we discuss this on the upcoming NetReady call. >> >> Regarding your access restrictions, what does this mean in practice? >> Can >> you access the OPNFV Gerrit? >> >> Best regards >> Georg >> >> > From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >> Fatemeh >> Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2016 1:24 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [netready] start point for >> contribution. >> >> Hi Georg, >> >> Your response to my question was encouraging. Thank you for spending >> time >> to point out all available options. I'd taken a look at the latest >> version >> of the requirements doc and backlogs in jira. I found these use cases >> interesting in requirements doc : "2.4.2. Connection between different >> OpenStack regions or cloud instances" , "2.3. Programmable Provisioning >> of >> Provider networks" >> I think the first one would be my better choice for start point! >> >> I hope, our combined efforts will give us a good coordination and great >> result. >> >> P.S: I'm from Iran. Although the sanctions against Iran were lifted, We >> don't have any direct access to the latest version of requirements doc. >> >> Kindest regards, >> Fatemeh Abdollahei >> On ۱۶/۰۶/۳۰ 12:32, Georg Kunz wrote: >> Hi Fatemeh, >> >> sorry for the late reply. Well, yes, we have a few items in our backlog >> in >> Jira that nobody has picked up yet. Currently, we are working towards a >> first version of our requirements document. The goal is to get a stable >> version with a small selection of use cases which we can then discuss >> with >> the OpenStack Neutron developers. >> >> I basically see three ways of contributing to the project: >> >> i) support the ongoing effort of stabilizing the current version of the >> requirements doc. You can have a look at the latest version here [1]. >> If >> you find one of the use cases interesting, just let us know and we can >> coordinate further. >> >> ii) you have a networking use case on your mind which is challenging to >> realize based on the currently available features in OpenStack or which >> is >> basically missing at all. If so, feel free to bring it up here or in >> our >> weekly meeting and we can discuss it. >> >> iii) have a look at our backlog in Jira. If you find a particular use >> case interesting, let's discuss it and see if you want to add it to the >> requirements doc. Please note, however, that the Jira backlog is >> currently >> not well managed I have to admit. (Note to myself: clean up Jira!) >> >> I hope, this overview helps you a bit. You are very welcome to join the >> project and join the weekly meetings. >> >> [1] http://artifacts.opnfv.org/netready/docs/requirements/index.html >> >> Best regards >> Georg >> >> >> > From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >> [email protected] >> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 11:06 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [netready] start point for contribution. >> >> >> Dear all, >> >> >> I've just taken a look at NetReady project and now I have a question >> about >> it. As there are many issues in "To DO" state, I was wondering where >> the >> appropriate start point would be. >> How can I contribute in NetReady project? What is your suggestion for >> the >> start point? >> >> >> Thanks in advance and looking forward to hearing from you, >> >> >> Fatemeh Abdollahei >> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
