Hi Georg, Sorry for answering too late; As you mentioned, I reviewed requirement’s document and I think the following points should be considered: 1. In sections 2.1.1, 2.1.3.1 , 2.4, I think� a picture could make descriptions more clear. 2. In sections 2.5.1 and 2.5.2, I think two high level architeture pictures could show how instances or clouds's networks would be seprated.) ( as a sample: docs.openstack.org/mitaka/networking-guide/scenario-provider-ovs.html) � I’m working on finding a good example for your suggested part (2.4.2), I think these scenarios are not bad : http://docs.openstack.org/mitaka/networking-guide/scenario-provider-lb.html , http://docs.openstack.org/mitaka/networking-guide/scenario-provider-ovs.html , but actually I’m not sure; So I’m digging into Neutron provider and tenant networks in openstack to give you a good example. � P.S. I have direct access to Gerrit and� indirect access to opnfv requirement’s doc (using VPN), but we want to have direct access because the sanctions against Iran were lifted.:) � > Hi Fathemeh, > > Great. Gergely (in CC) is the main author of those use cases, so you can > contact him or we discuss this on the upcoming NetReady call. > > Regarding your access restrictions, what does this mean in practice? Can > you access the OPNFV Gerrit? > > Best regards > Georg > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Fatemeh > Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2016 1:24 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [netready] start point for > contribution. > > Hi Georg, > > Your response to my question was encouraging. Thank you for spending time > to point out all available options. I'd taken a look at the latest version > of the requirements doc and backlogs in jira. I found these use cases > interesting in requirements doc : "2.4.2. Connection between different > OpenStack regions or cloud instances" , "2.3. Programmable Provisioning of > Provider networks" > I think the first one would be my better choice for start point! > > I hope, our combined efforts will give us a good coordination and great > result. > > P.S: I'm from Iran. Although the sanctions against Iran were lifted, We > don't have any direct access to the latest version of requirements doc. > > Kindest regards, > Fatemeh Abdollahei > On ۱۶/۰۶/۳۰ 12:32, Georg Kunz wrote: > Hi Fatemeh, > > sorry for the late reply. Well, yes, we have a few items in our backlog in > Jira that nobody has picked up yet. Currently, we are working towards a > first version of our requirements document. The goal is to get a stable > version with a small selection of use cases which we can then discuss with > the OpenStack Neutron developers. > > I basically see three ways of contributing to the project: > > i) support the ongoing effort of stabilizing the current version of the > requirements doc. You can have a look at the latest version here [1]. If > you find one of the use cases interesting, just let us know and we can > coordinate further. > > ii) you have a networking use case on your mind which is challenging to > realize based on the currently available features in OpenStack or which is > basically missing at all. If so, feel free to bring it up here or in our > weekly meeting and we can discuss it. > > iii) have a look at our backlog in Jira. If you find a particular use > case interesting, let's discuss it and see if you want to add it to the > requirements doc. Please note, however, that the Jira backlog is currently > not well managed I have to admit. (Note to myself: clean up Jira!) > > I hope, this overview helps you a bit. You are very welcome to join the > project and join the weekly meetings. > > [1] http://artifacts.opnfv.org/netready/docs/requirements/index.html > > Best regards > Georg > > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > [email protected] > Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 11:06 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [netready] start point for contribution. > > > Dear all, > > > I've just taken a look at NetReady project and now I have a question about > it. As there are many issues in "To DO" state, I was wondering where the > appropriate start point would be. > How can I contribute in NetReady project? What is your suggestion for the > start point? > > > Thanks in advance and looking forward to hearing from you, > > > Fatemeh Abdollahei > > >
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
