On 18/01/2024 17.50, Dave Taht wrote:
tee-hee. For the record, I would prefer less (and less buggy) offloads
than offloads, and to work on scaling software better to multi-cores.
I also would love to find a chip where fq_codel could be offloaded,
but with open source for the offload, since the nss drivers are
slightly broken...
I also would like a pony.
Not sure if a pony is the extra addition/feature I need. I'm more of a
dog person ;-)
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 11:40 AM Chuanhong Guo <gch981...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi!
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 12:23 AM Fernando Frediani <fhfredi...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, interesting. Is it enough to give it the necessary performance boost
when doing NAT ? Is it capable of doing it on the chip or does it do on
the CPU ? Reading about it seems to be a software thing although seems
there are hardware capable devices as well. How comparable is this to a
chip that has NAT offload capability ?
MT7981 is such a chip with NAT offload capability, and the
flow-offload driver mentioned in other threads is actually
a driver for this hardware block.
Since it's a cost-down MT7986 I would imagine this particular
feature is the same between them:
HW NAT
− Etherent/WiFi
− Wired speed
− IPv4 routing, NAT, NAPT
− IPv6 routing, DS-Lite, 6RD
--
Regards,
Chuanhong Guo
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Gregers Baur-Petersen
Anthropologist
-----------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
