Am 14. Juli 2023 10:26:33 MESZ schrieb "Rafał Miłecki" <zaj...@gmail.com>:
>On 9.05.2023 18:21, Felix Baumann wrote:
>> Am 9. Mai 2023 15:29:48 MESZ schrieb "Rafał Miłecki" <zaj...@gmail.com>:
>>> From: Rafał Miłecki <ra...@milecki.pl>
>>>
>>> There is no need to use reference if original node it specified in
>>> exactly the same file. This is a minor cleanup simplifying DTS code.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <ra...@milecki.pl>
>>> ---
>>> .../linux/ramips/dts/mt7621_netgear_r6220.dts | 18 ++++++++----------
>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/target/linux/ramips/dts/mt7621_netgear_r6220.dts
>>> b/target/linux/ramips/dts/mt7621_netgear_r6220.dts
>>> index 0f476ef060..7bb49c15b4 100644
>>> --- a/target/linux/ramips/dts/mt7621_netgear_r6220.dts
>>> +++ b/target/linux/ramips/dts/mt7621_netgear_r6220.dts
>>> @@ -42,9 +42,17 @@
>>> };
>>>
>>> factory: partition@2e00000 {
>>
>> The "factory" reference could be probably be dropped as well. Proposed
>> changes look good to me.
>
>Actually it can't be dropped. While it's a bit counter-intuitive, that
>label is used in a *parent* DTS file mt7621_netgear_sercomm_ayx.dtsi .
Hello Rafał,
I was under the strong impression that dts(i) files could only get reference
from the same file or parents but not childs. I remember reading a few
exchanges by Ansuel, I think, that mentioned this.
I might be mixing two topics here, but was this (intended to be) fixed by
dynamic partitions or something like that?
Are you certain the eeprom is loaded successfully?
Aren't dts(i) files read from top to bottom?
Regards
Felix Baumann
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
