Hi, On 9/16/20 11:40 AM, Adrian Schmutzler wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] >> On Behalf Of Sven Roederer >> Sent: Mittwoch, 16. September 2020 09:17 >> To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >> Subject: ath79: move 8/32 boards to tiny subtarget >> >> Hi, >> >> not sure if this has been discussed before. >> I recently worked with some 8/32 boards (Ubiquiti Nanostation M (XM), >> TPLink >> WR842 v2) for our Freifunk-project and realized that the low RAM situation >> requires quite different handling than the full boards (8+/64+). >> >> I wonder if there is a reason to not move the boards, which are affected by >> the 4/32MB warning also, to the ath79-tiny target? > > I wonder whether the tiny subtarget will actually make much difference for > RAM issues?
In it's current state, it will most likely increase low-memory issues as the squashfs blocksize is 1024kB compared to the regular 256kB. Not that ath79-tiny has no target-flag for small memory set. Best wishes David > > Best > > Adrian > >> >> Sven >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> openwrt-devel mailing list >> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >> >> _______________________________________________ >> openwrt-devel mailing list >> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
