> -----Original Message----- > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] > On Behalf Of Sven Roederer > Sent: Mittwoch, 16. September 2020 09:17 > To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > Subject: ath79: move 8/32 boards to tiny subtarget > > Hi, > > not sure if this has been discussed before. > I recently worked with some 8/32 boards (Ubiquiti Nanostation M (XM), > TPLink > WR842 v2) for our Freifunk-project and realized that the low RAM situation > requires quite different handling than the full boards (8+/64+). > > I wonder if there is a reason to not move the boards, which are affected by > the 4/32MB warning also, to the ath79-tiny target?
I wonder whether the tiny subtarget will actually make much difference for RAM issues? Best Adrian > > Sven > > > > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
