Hi David, Hi Hauke, > -----Original Message----- > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] > On Behalf Of Hauke Mehrtens > Sent: Samstag, 11. April 2020 17:37 > To: David Bauer <m...@david-bauer.net>; Paul Blazejowski > <pa...@blazebox.homeip.net> > Cc: Michal Cieslakiewicz <michal.cieslakiew...@wp.pl>; openwrt- > de...@lists.openwrt.org > Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ath79: switch to kernel 5.4 > > On 4/11/20 5:13 PM, David Bauer wrote: > > Hello Paul, > > > > On 4/3/20 10:58 PM, Paul Blazejowski wrote: > >> Hello David, > >> > >> It is great to hear to we're switching to 5.4 on ath79 target but i > >> wanted to bring to your attention that at least on the NAND > >> subtargets (for me wndr3700v4) we need this commit [1] from Kevin to > >> get the router to boot otherwise there's an oops in do dsp which > >> prevents my router to boot and produces bootloop, Kevin's patch is > >> incomplete as i have also alter it locally to apply to 5.4 kernel. > >> With Michal's mtd concat patch i have successfully run the > >> kernel/build for a couple of days with no issues. Maybe Michal can > >> chaim in to confirm as he uses the same hardware in WNDR4300 routers > just to be sure? > > > > I've bisected this issue a bit further. Changing the CPU type for the > > whole target doesn't seem right, as boards prior to AR934x are 24kc. > > > > I've isolated the issue we are facing to 308-mips32r2_tune.patch. I'm > > a bit puzzled how to proceed as i suspect other targets using a 74kc > > arch will most likely show the same issue. > > > > I propose to revert the change for ath79 locally using a target patch > > to allow the target to be upgraded to Kernel 5.4. > > > > IMHO 308-mips32r2_tune.patch should be a target specific patch anyhow, > > as optimizing for a single CPU arch for all affected targets might not > > be very efficient. But I'm not all to familiar with this topic. > > > > Best wishes > > David > > Hi, > > I also get this problem with mainline kernel. > > See here for some more details: > https://bugs.openwrt.org/index.php?do=details&task_id=2928 > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94506
What's the status on this issue? Is it still there, and do we still have a blocker for 5.4 on ath79? Best Adrian > > Hauke > > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
