Hi, W dniu 04.05.2019 o 00:04, Hauke Mehrtens pisze: > On 5/1/19 7:42 PM, Tomasz Maciej Nowak wrote: >> Replace SoC names with vendors in device names, in few cases, and add >> vendor to developemnt boards for easier identyfying potential firmware to >> flash. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Maciej Nowak <tome...@o2.pl> > > >> diff --git a/target/linux/mvebu/image/cortex-a72.mk >> b/target/linux/mvebu/image/cortex-a72.mk >> index 824f6b5d0f..3043f087cc 100644 >> --- a/target/linux/mvebu/image/cortex-a72.mk >> +++ b/target/linux/mvebu/image/cortex-a72.mk >> @@ -1,30 +1,30 @@ >> ifeq ($(SUBTARGET),cortexa72) >> >> -define Device/armada-macchiatobin >> +define Device/marvell-macchiatobin >> $(call Device/Default-arm64) >> DEVICE_TITLE := MACCHIATObin (SolidRun Armada 8040 Community Board) >> DEVICE_PACKAGES += kmod-i2c-core kmod-i2c-mux kmod-i2c-mux-pca954x >> DEVICE_DTS := armada-8040-mcbin >> SUPPORTED_DEVICES := marvell,armada8040-mcbin >> endef >> -TARGET_DEVICES += armada-macchiatobin >> +TARGET_DEVICES += marvell-macchiatobin > > This board is from solidrun
Yes, this case did make me confused. I went with what's in model and compatible string in dts. SolidRun also calls it that way: https://www.solid-run.com/marvell-armada-family/macchiatobin But I'll change that in next version. Regards -- TMN _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
