Dmitry Tunin <hanipouspi...@gmail.com> 于2018年8月23日周四 上午1:24写道：
>
> I looked into the specs and now I see that the
> AR71XX_RESET_REG_MISC_INT_STATUS is read-only on ar7100, so we need to
> change the compatible
> to "qca,ar7100-misc-intc" and also change it for the "real" misc
> controller. Writing to RO register makes no sense at all.
Please be aware that the access mode is *RO/RWC*, meaning *Read/Write to Clear*.
>
> Nothing is said about these registers in AR7240 datasheet, but I
> suspect they work exactly same way ;-).
>
> >
> > Looking into irq-ath79-misc.c I found a few things to cleanup.
> >
> > 1. It appears that two chips are declared: "qca,ar7100-misc-intc" and
> > "qca,ar7240-misc-intc".
> > The only difference is mask-ack proc. The registers seem to work the
> > same way and practically we are using "qca,ar7240-misc-intc" on ar7100
> > according to dtsi.
> > I found that the other chip was declared only when looking into the code.
> >
> > At the same time the code I removed from the PCI driver used the
> > ar7100 type of mask-ack, that worked also OK.
> >
> > I see no reason of having two different ways of mask-ack for similar
> > hardware. We need to chose one that looks better and drop the other.
> >
> > 2. Instead of declaring two different chips this way, since we are
> > reusing this driver for PCI, I suggest to declare also
> > "qca,ath79-pci-intc" that will
> > have a different chip name = "PCI", so that "MISC and "PCI" will be
> > seen separately in /proc/interrupts.
> >
> > 3. I suggest removing legacy __init ath79_misc_irq_init() and leaving
> > only the OF stuff.
> >
> > Any comments?
> > ср, 22 авг. 2018 г. в 14:47, Chuanhong Guo <gch981...@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > Dmitry Tunin <hanipouspi...@gmail.com> 于2018年8月22日周三 下午5:07写道：
> > > >
> > > > Currently all PCI devices get the same IRQ that affects performance
> > > > badly.
> > > >
> > > > This commit adresses this problem and cleans the code.
> > > >
> > > > ar7100 has a special PCI interrupt controller@18060018 that works
> > > > exactly
> > > > the same way as misc interrupt controller.
> > > >
> > > > This patch does the following:
> > > >
> > > > 1. Removes all IRQ handling code from the PCI driver.
> > > > 2. Defines pci-intc interrupt controller@18060018 in dtsi.
> > > > 3. Removes interrupt-controller property from PCI node.
> > > > 4. Sets a correct interrupt mask for PCI devices.
> > > >
> > > > Run tested on DIR-825 B1.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Tunin <hanipouspi...@gmail.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > target/linux/ath79/dts/ar7100.dtsi | 21 +++-
> > > > .../0036-MIPS-ath79-remove-irq-code-from-pci.patch | 117
> > > > +++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > 2 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > > create mode 100644
> > > > target/linux/ath79/patches-4.14/0036-MIPS-ath79-remove-irq-code-from-pci.patch
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/target/linux/ath79/dts/ar7100.dtsi
> > > > b/target/linux/ath79/dts/ar7100.dtsi
> > > > index 8994a7d..0632050 100644
> > > > --- a/target/linux/ath79/dts/ar7100.dtsi
> > > > +++ b/target/linux/ath79/dts/ar7100.dtsi
> > > > @@ -88,6 +88,14 @@
> > > > clock-names = "wdt";
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > + pci_intc: interrupt-controller@18060018 {
> > > > + compatible = "qca,ar7240-misc-intc";
> > > > + reg = <0x18060018 0x4>;
> > > I guess this should be <0x18060018 0x8>?
> > > Interrupt status is at 0x18060018-0x1806001c and interrupt mask is at
> > > 0x1806001c-0x18060020. The length of used memory space is 8 bytes.
> > > BTW I noticed that reg of miscintc is <0x18060010 0x4> but the
> > > register of interrupt status and mask is 0x18060010-0x18060018, also 8
> > > bytes.
> > > Are these two mistakes or my misunderstanding of the size in reg property?
> > > > + interrupt-parent = <&cpuintc>;
> > > > + interrupts = <2>;
> > > > + interrupt-controller;
> > > > + #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> > > > + };
> > > >
> > > > rst: reset-controller@18060024 {
> > > > compatible = "qca,ar7100-reset";
> > > > @@ -105,14 +113,17 @@
> > > > reg-names = "cfg_base";
> > > > ranges = <0x2000000 0 0x10000000
> > > > 0x10000000 0 0x07000000 /* pci memory */
> > > > 0x1000000 0 0x00000000
> > > > 0x0000000 0 0x000001>; /* io space */
> > > > - interrupt-parent = <&cpuintc>;
> > > > - interrupts = <2>;
> > > >
> > > > - interrupt-controller;
> > > > + interrupt-parent = <&pci_intc>;
> > > > + interrupts = <4>;
> > > > +
> > > > #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> > > >
> > > > - interrupt-map-mask = <0 0 0 1>;
> > > > - interrupt-map = <0 0 0 0 &pcie0 0>;
> > > > + interrupt-map-mask = <0xf800 0 0 0>;
> > > > + interrupt-map = <0x8800 0 0 0 &pci_intc > > > > 0
> > > > + 0x9000 0 0 0 &pci_intc
> > > > 1
> > > > + 0x9800 0 0 0 &pci_intc
> > > > 2>;
> > > > +
> > > > status = "disabled";
> > > > };
> > > > };
> > > > diff --git
> > > > a/target/linux/ath79/patches-4.14/0036-MIPS-ath79-remove-irq-code-from-pci.patch
> > > >
> > > > b/target/linux/ath79/patches-4.14/0036-MIPS-ath79-remove-irq-code-from-pci.patch
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 0000000..b3fc19a
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++
> > > > b/target/linux/ath79/patches-4.14/0036-MIPS-ath79-remove-irq-code-from-pci.patch
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
> > > > +Index: linux-4.14.65/arch/mips/pci/pci-ar71xx.c
> > > > +===================================================================
> > > > +--- linux-4.14.65.orig/arch/mips/pci/pci-ar71xx.c
> > > > ++++ linux-4.14.65/arch/mips/pci/pci-ar71xx.c
> > > > +@@ -269,103 +269,6 @@ static struct pci_ops ar71xx_pci_ops = {
> > > > + .write = ar71xx_pci_write_config,
> > > > + };
> > > > +
> > > > +-static void ar71xx_pci_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
> > > > +-{
> > > > +- void __iomem *base = ath79_reset_base;
> > > > +- struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> > > > +- struct ar71xx_pci_controller *apc =
> > > > irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> > > > +- u32 pending;
> > > > +-
> > > > +- chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
> > > > +- pending = __raw_readl(base + AR71XX_RESET_REG_PCI_INT_STATUS) &
> > > > +- __raw_readl(base + AR71XX_RESET_REG_PCI_INT_ENABLE);
> > > > +-
> > > > +- if (pending & AR71XX_PCI_INT_DEV0)
> > > > +- generic_handle_irq(irq_linear_revmap(apc->domain, 1));
> > > > +-
> > > > +- else if (pending & AR71XX_PCI_INT_DEV1)
> > > > +- generic_handle_irq(irq_linear_revmap(apc->domain, 2));
> > > > +-
> > > > +- else if (pending & AR71XX_PCI_INT_DEV2)
> > > > +- generic_handle_irq(irq_linear_revmap(apc->domain, 3));
> > > > +-
> > > > +- else if (pending & AR71XX_PCI_INT_CORE)
> > > > +- generic_handle_irq(irq_linear_revmap(apc->domain, 4));
> > > > +-
> > > > +- else
> > > > +- spurious_interrupt();
> > > > +- chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
> > > > +-}
> > > > +-
> > > > +-static void ar71xx_pci_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
> > > > +-{
> > > > +- struct ar71xx_pci_controller *apc;
> > > > +- unsigned int irq;
> > > > +- void __iomem *base = ath79_reset_base;
> > > > +- u32 t;
> > > > +-
> > > > +- apc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> > > > +- irq = irq_linear_revmap(apc->domain, d->irq);
> > > > +-
> > > > +- t = __raw_readl(base + AR71XX_RESET_REG_PCI_INT_ENABLE);
> > > > +- __raw_writel(t | (1 << irq), base +
> > > > AR71XX_RESET_REG_PCI_INT_ENABLE);
> > > > +-
> > > > +- /* flush write */
> > > > +- __raw_readl(base + AR71XX_RESET_REG_PCI_INT_ENABLE);
> > > > +-}
> > > > +-
> > > > +-static void ar71xx_pci_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
> > > > +-{
> > > > +- struct ar71xx_pci_controller *apc;
> > > > +- unsigned int irq;
> > > > +- void __iomem *base = ath79_reset_base;
> > > > +- u32 t;
> > > > +-
> > > > +- apc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> > > > +- irq = irq_linear_revmap(apc->domain, d->irq);
> > > > +-
> > > > +- t = __raw_readl(base + AR71XX_RESET_REG_PCI_INT_ENABLE);
> > > > +- __raw_writel(t & ~(1 << irq), base +
> > > > AR71XX_RESET_REG_PCI_INT_ENABLE);
> > > > +-
> > > > +- /* flush write */
> > > > +- __raw_readl(base + AR71XX_RESET_REG_PCI_INT_ENABLE);
> > > > +-}
> > > > +-
> > > > +-static struct irq_chip ar71xx_pci_irq_chip = {
> > > > +- .name = "AR71XX PCI",
> > > > +- .irq_mask = ar71xx_pci_irq_mask,
> > > > +- .irq_unmask = ar71xx_pci_irq_unmask,
> > > > +- .irq_mask_ack = ar71xx_pci_irq_mask,
> > > > +-};
> > > > +-
> > > > +-static int ar71xx_pci_irq_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
> > > > irq_hw_number_t hw)
> > > > +-{
> > > > +- struct ar71xx_pci_controller *apc = d->host_data;
> > > > +-
> > > > +- irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &ar71xx_pci_irq_chip,
> > > > handle_level_irq);
> > > > +- irq_set_chip_data(irq, apc);
> > > > +-
> > > > +- return 0;
> > > > +-}
> > > > +-
> > > > +-static const struct irq_domain_ops ar71xx_pci_domain_ops = {
> > > > +- .xlate = irq_domain_xlate_onecell,
> > > > +- .map = ar71xx_pci_irq_map,
> > > > +-};
> > > > +-
> > > > +-static void ar71xx_pci_irq_init(struct ar71xx_pci_controller *apc)
> > > > +-{
> > > > +- void __iomem *base = ath79_reset_base;
> > > > +-
> > > > +- __raw_writel(0, base + AR71XX_RESET_REG_PCI_INT_ENABLE);
> > > > +- __raw_writel(0, base + AR71XX_RESET_REG_PCI_INT_STATUS);
> > > > +-
> > > > +- apc->domain = irq_domain_add_linear(apc->np,
> > > > AR71XX_PCI_IRQ_COUNT,
> > > > +- &ar71xx_pci_domain_ops,
> > > > apc);
> > > > +- irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(apc->irq,
> > > > ar71xx_pci_irq_handler,
> > > > +- apc);
> > > > +-}
> > > > +-
> > > > + static void ar71xx_pci_reset(void)
> > > > + {
> > > > + ath79_device_reset_set(AR71XX_RESET_PCI_BUS |
> > > > AR71XX_RESET_PCI_CORE);
> > > > +@@ -419,8 +322,6 @@ static int ar71xx_pci_probe(struct platf
> > > > + apc->pci_ctrl.io_resource = &apc->io_res;
> > > > + pci_load_of_ranges(&apc->pci_ctrl, pdev->dev.of_node);
> > > > +
> > > > +- ar71xx_pci_irq_init(apc);
> > > > +-
> > > > + register_pci_controller(&apc->pci_ctrl);
> > > > +
> > > > + __ath79_pci_swizzle_b = ar71xx_pci_swizzle_b;
> > > > --
> > > > 2.7.4
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > openwrt-devel mailing list
> > > > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> > > > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
