Hi,
it's just a cosmetic change. Now I understand I shouldn't do that.
Should I create a new patch?
Regards,
Martin
27. 8. 2015 v 11:23, Jonas Gorski <j...@openwrt.org>:
>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 7:18 PM, Martin Tesar <tesar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Add support for Comtrend VR-3026e v1.
>> The device is almost identical to the Comtrend VR-3025un.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Martin Tesar <tesar...@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> target/linux/brcm63xx/base-files/etc/diag.sh | 3 +
>> .../base-files/etc/uci-defaults/02_network | 3 +-
>> .../base-files/etc/uci-defaults/09_fix_crc | 1 +
>> target/linux/brcm63xx/base-files/lib/brcm63xx.sh | 3 +
>> .../lib/preinit/05_init_interfaces_brcm63xx | 1 +
>> target/linux/brcm63xx/dts/vr-3026e.dts | 88
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> target/linux/brcm63xx/image/Makefile | 2 +
>> .../brcm63xx/patches-3.18/572-board_VR-3026e.patch | 79 +++++++++++++++++++
>> .../brcm63xx/patches-4.1/572-board_VR-3026e.patch | 79 +++++++++++++++++++
>> target/linux/brcm63xx/profiles/comtrend.mk | 9 +++
>> 10 files changed, 267 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> create mode 100644 target/linux/brcm63xx/dts/vr-3026e.dts
>> create mode 100644
>> target/linux/brcm63xx/patches-3.18/572-board_VR-3026e.patch
>> create mode 100644 target/linux/brcm63xx/patches-4.1/572-board_VR-3026e.patch
>>
>> diff --git a/target/linux/brcm63xx/base-files/etc/diag.sh
>> b/target/linux/brcm63xx/base-files/etc/diag.sh
>> index 7916ac2..7826fad 100644
>> --- a/target/linux/brcm63xx/base-files/etc/diag.sh
>> +++ b/target/linux/brcm63xx/base-files/etc/diag.sh
>> @@ -39,6 +39,9 @@ set_state() {
>> vr-3025u)
>> status_led="VR-3025u:green:power"
>> ;;
>> + vr-3026e)
>> + status_led="VR-3026e:green:power"
>> + ;;
>> wap-5813n)
>> status_led="WAP-5813n:green:power"
>> ;;
>> diff --git a/target/linux/brcm63xx/base-files/etc/uci-defaults/02_network
>> b/target/linux/brcm63xx/base-files/etc/uci-defaults/02_network
>> index 2ff9e45..4de861c 100644
>> --- a/target/linux/brcm63xx/base-files/etc/uci-defaults/02_network
>> +++ b/target/linux/brcm63xx/base-files/etc/uci-defaults/02_network
>> @@ -94,8 +94,9 @@ fast2504n |\
>> fast2704v2 |\
>> hg655b |\
>> p870hw-51a_v2 |\
>> +vr-3025u |\
>> vr-3025un |\
>> -vr-3025u)
>> +vr-3026e)
>
> Why did you change the order of vr-3025u and vr-3025un here? You
> didn't do this in your previous versions. Please do not add random
> cleanups/changes to your patches.
>
>
> Jonas
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
